Not a Warhol. (image source: Pixabay, Rosiette-stock, royalty-free stock illustration, modified)

Artistic Innovation or Copyright Infringement? The Warhol-Goldsmith Legal Clash and Creative Freedom

Rob Burgner | 31 AUG 2023

[On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a 7-2 vote, ruled that artist Andy Warhol infringed on the copyright of photographer Lynn Goldsmith when he created a series of silkscreen images based upon a 1981 Goldsmith photograph of the late musician Prince.]

In the world of art and copyright, a captivating battle has unfolded, leaving museums and art institutions on edge. The legacy of the iconic pop artist Andy Warhol has sparked a legal debate that raises profound questions about the intersection of creativity, ownership, and transformative art.

The 2021 Lawsuit: At the heart of the matter lies a lawsuit that surfaced in 2021. The dispute revolves around whether certain works created by Warhol infringe on the copyright of photographer Lynn Goldsmith. The focal point of the lawsuit is Warhol’s artistic reinterpretation of Goldsmith’s portrait of the legendary musician Prince.

Goldsmith’s lens captured the enigmatic musician, while Warhol’s creative flair transformed the photograph into an art piece that’s unmistakably Warhol. (I’m not including the image here. Fair use allows copyrighted material to be used without a license if it is in the public interest. This can apply to fields such as news reporting or education. It’s debatable whether I could be considered a reporter or an educator, so let’s err on the side of not getting sued.)

  • SPI01_23-09-24-Inon-Barnatan
  • AD ECMSA 2023-24 season
  • SCH01 Balourdet Quartet with Jordan Bak, viola

The Transformative Art Argument: Warhol’s artistry was renowned for pushing boundaries and redefining norms, often merging different forms of expression to create something entirely new. The transformative nature of Warhol’s work is a central pillar of his legacy. It’s a creative process that brings into question where the line between inspiration and infringement truly lies.

Artistic Expression vs. Copyright: This lawsuit sheds light on a complex dilemma faced by the art world and copyright law. While copyright protection is crucial for artists and creators, the concept of transformative art raises complexities. Does a reinterpretation, a reimagining, a remix, deserve the same level of protection as an original work? Or does it serve as a testament to the ever-evolving nature of artistic expression?

The Broader Implications: The implications of this legal clash reverberate in museums and galleries. Museums, often the guardians of artistic heritage, find themselves navigating uncharted waters as they showcase works that challenge the conventional boundaries of creativity and ownership.

A Call for Dialogue: The convergence of art and law invites us to ponder the delicate balance between honoring the rights of creators and celebrating the evolution of art itself.

Join the Conversation: Have you been following this legal tussle? What are your thoughts on the tension between artistic inspiration and copyright protection?

Join the conversation on EarRelevant’s Facebook page or Rob Burgner’s Linked-in page.


About the author:
Rob Burgner is Plenipotentiary of Bleeding Edge, Inc. marketing & video pro, writer, musician/composer, black belt, Libertarian, world traveler, lover of fine bourbon & dogs.